Harley & Son logo AS9102.report

Guide

A Rejected FAIR Now Costs More Than the Rework

First article documentation used to be paperwork. Increasingly, it's a scored quality event. Here's why a completeness review before you hit "submit" is the cheapest insurance in your FAI process.

FAIR findings are becoming quality escapes

Many primes and Tier 1s now track documentation rejections in the same supplier scorecards that track escapes and on-time delivery. A FAIR bounced for blank fields or an undispositioned out-of-tolerance value can register against your quality rating just like a nonconforming part — and a slipping score means more source inspection, more surveillance, and a weaker position on the next award. The part can be perfect; the paperwork still dings you.

There's a second cost that doesn't show up on the scorecard: the resubmission cycle. A rejected FAIR typically means a hold on the shipment it accompanies, a round trip through your customer's supplier-quality queue, and days — sometimes weeks — of delay on a part that was ready to ship.

Where completed FAIRs actually fail

Most rejections don't come from the hard part — the GD&T interpretation or the characteristic extraction. They come from the assembly of the final package, after the measurements are done:

  • Blank or missed "Results" fields — a balloon with no recorded result is an automatic bounce
  • Out-of-tolerance results submitted without disposition — an OOT actual needs a nonconformance reference, not silence
  • Cert numbers that don't match Form 2 — the heat lot on the mill cert differs from what's transcribed
  • Revision mismatches — the FAIR says Rev B, the attached drawing or cert says Rev A
  • Unit and format inconsistencies — metric actuals against inch nominals, missing leading zeros that change a reading
  • Missing signatures and dates — Form 1 approvals left for "later"
  • Customer-specific fields ignored — the supplement your Tier 1 flows down that isn't part of standard AS9102

Every one of these is trivially catchable — by a second set of eyes that knows what reviewers look for, checking the package cold, the way your customer's supplier-quality engineer will.

What a pre-submission completeness review covers

A completeness and consistency review walks the finished package end to end: every characteristic has a recorded result, every flagged field is filled, revisions and units are consistent across forms, drawing, and certs, and any out-of-tolerance results are identified for your disposition. To be clear about scope: it's not a conformity determination and not an approval — nobody but you can accept your product, and no reviewer can guarantee what your customer will do. What it does is remove the unforced errors, which are the majority of rejections.

Included with every AS9102.report package: after your team enters the measurements and attaches certs, send the finished package back — one pre-submission completeness review is included at no charge, against the same completion checklist we deliver with your forms.

Prepared your FAIR in-house?

A standalone pre-submission review for FAIRs prepared outside our service is coming soon. If you'd like an expert completeness check on a package you built yourself — before your customer sees it — contact us and we'll let you know when it's available (or help sooner if timing is critical).

Skip the findings cycle entirely

Complete AS9102 Forms 1–3, ballooned drawing, completion checklist, and a free pre-submission review — from $125, in 2–3 business days.

Get an Instant Quote